Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 21:20:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 21:19:59 -0400 Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.101]:65263 "EHLO e1.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 21:19:59 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: James Cleverdon Reply-To: jamesclv@us.ibm.com Organization: IBM xSeries Linux Solutions To: Zwane Mwaikambo , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH] NUMA-Q disable irqbalance Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 18:23:55 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.1 Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" , linux-kernel , Matt Dobson References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <200208261823.55005.jamesclv@us.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1046 Lines: 26 On Saturday 24 August 2002 05:19 am, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote: > On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Well, it makes performance _so_ much better on a P4 that it's not even > > funny. It's basically a "P4 is unusable with SMP" without it. > > Out of interest, does anyone have an idea of what Windows does? > > Zwane I'm not allowed to report second hand rumors from the folks who assisted with the debug of the x440 HAL, so I won't mention that they may or may not be using clustered logical interrupts and adjusting priority with the TPR. I can admit that I have no clue how they assign IRQs to APIC clusters, whether randomly or if they try some load balancing scheme. -- James Cleverdon IBM xSeries Linux Solutions {jamesclv(Unix, preferred), cleverdj(Notes)} at us dot ibm dot com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/