Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 05:57:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 05:57:04 -0500 Received: from CPE-61-9-148-107.vic.bigpond.net.au ([61.9.148.107]:43000 "EHLO elektra.higherplane.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 05:56:50 -0500 Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 21:56:55 +1100 From: john slee To: "Jeff V. Merkey" Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks! Message-ID: <20001030215655.B655@higherplane.net> In-Reply-To: <20001030025424.A20271@vger.timpanogas.org> <20001030030625.C20271@vger.timpanogas.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20001030030625.C20271@vger.timpanogas.org>; from jmerkey@vger.timpanogas.org on Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 03:06:25AM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 03:06:25AM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > Ingo, This original thread was regarding Linux vs. NetWare 5.x performance > metrics and responses from Linux folks about how to affect and > improve them, not a diatribe on the features of TUX. while beating netware in certain areas is certainly a noble goal, it is far from the only one. [snip] > If you have some ideas on how to improve file and print or help me > get a linux incarnation that can stomp NetWare, I'd love to hear > your ideas. I think TUX is great, BTW. Otherwise, end-of-line... if netware users are happy with netware, i can't see why they'd want to switch to linux or a linux-netware-ish equivalent while netware are still around to provide support. "ain't broke, don't fix," etc. j. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/