Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 06:20:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 06:20:13 -0400 Received: from mail.cyberus.ca ([216.191.240.111]:46255 "EHLO cyberus.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 06:20:12 -0400 Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 06:17:42 -0400 (EDT) From: jamal To: Mala Anand cc: , , Robert Olsson , Bill Hartner , Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: (RFC): SKB Initialization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 918 Lines: 26 On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Mala Anand wrote: > Troy Wilson (who works with me) posted SPECweb99 results using my > skbinit patch to lkml on Friday: > http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0208.2/1470.html > I know you don't subscribe to lkml. Have you seen these results? > On Numa machine it showed around 3% improvement using SPECweb99. > The posting you pointed to says 1% - not that it matters. It becomes more insignificant when skb recycling comes in play mostly because the alloc and freeing of skbs doesnt really show up as hotlist item within the profile. I am not saying it is totaly useless -- anything that will save a few cycles is good; cheers, jamal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/