Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755970Ab2HTJQP (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Aug 2012 05:16:15 -0400 Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.105]:7717 "EHLO mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754617Ab2HTJQM (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Aug 2012 05:16:12 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,796,1336341600"; d="scan'208";a="153403004" Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 11:15:53 +0200 (CEST) From: Julia Lawall X-X-Sender: jll@localhost6.localdomain6 To: Takashi Iwai cc: Julia Lawall , Jaroslav Kysela , Mark Brown , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 0/10] fix error return code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1345359780-18647-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 781 Lines: 23 On Mon, 20 Aug 2012, Takashi Iwai wrote: > At Sun, 19 Aug 2012 09:02:51 +0200, > Julia Lawall wrote: >> >> These patches fix cases where the return code appears to be unintentially >> nonnegative. > > The patch 10/10 seems missing. Or are all 9 patches? The patch > number suddenly changes to X/9 from 4. > > In anyway, the patches 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 are applied. > I leave patches 1, 2 and 4 to Mark. Sorry, I thought I fixed that, but I guess not enough. Patches 4 and 5 were the same originally. There is no patch 10. julia -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/