Message-ID: <50327B8F.3050503@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 20:01:51 +0200
From: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.5) Gecko/20120624 Icedove/10.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
CC: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
        Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>, Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>,
        Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
        Lior Amsalem <alior@marvell.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
        Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>,
        devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] pinctrl: mvebu: add pinctrl driver for Armada 370
References: <1344689809-6223-1-git-send-email-sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> <1344689809-6223-5-git-send-email-sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> <CACRpkdYNZar7865-T12J37h3AWA9-8R1R5tymuOhaB0b3ddEAA@mail.gmail.com> <50326A60.1070007@gmail.com> <20120820193622.4e539451@skate>
In-Reply-To: <20120820193622.4e539451@skate>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1276
Lines: 32

On 08/20/2012 07:36 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> In order to keep the consistency with other SoC families, maybe we can
> split the 370 and XP options in two separate MACH_ARMADA_370 and
> MACH_ARMADA_XP. So, in the ideal world, once all Marvell EBU SoCs are
> converted to DT+mach-mvebu, we should have:
>
>   *) arch/arm/Kconfig defines MACH_MVEBU
>
>   *) arch/arm/mach-mvebu/Kconfig defines MACH_KIRKWOOD, MACH_DOVE,
>      MACH_MX78X00, MACH_ARMADA_370, MACH_ARMADA_XP, MACH_ORION5X
>
> Then, an user is free to build a single kernel image that supports all,
> or a selection of the supported Marvell EBU SoCs.
>
> Would that be ok with you?

Yes!

> If that's fine with you, then I would prefer if we keep the single
> MACH_ARMADA_370_XP symbol for now, so that your pinctrl set of patches
> does not depend on something else. We would do the small Kconfig option
> refactoring as a follow-up set of patches. Thoughts?

Despite any objections, I will remove all arch/arm/*/Kconfig patches
from pinctrl patch set.

Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/