Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753747Ab2HUAXu (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Aug 2012 20:23:50 -0400 Received: from mail-qa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.216.46]:35750 "EHLO mail-qa0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752794Ab2HUAXp (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Aug 2012 20:23:45 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5032BDF5.1060800@xenotime.net> References: <1345242330.3841.8.camel@fedora64.linuxtx.org> <502EC5A6.7040502@xenotime.net> <5031C765.9050107@xenotime.net> <5032BDF5.1060800@xenotime.net> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 10:23:44 +1000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 3.5.x boot hang after conflicting fb hw usage vs VESA VGA - removing generic driver From: Dave Airlie To: Randy Dunlap Cc: "Justin M. Forbes" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fedoraproject.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3075 Lines: 78 On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 08/19/2012 10:22 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: >>> On 08/17/12 15:55, Dave Airlie wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: >>>>> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: >>>>>> On 08/17/2012 03:25 PM, Justin M. Forbes wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> for , we have verified cases on inteldrmfb, radeondrmfb, and >>>>>>> cirrusdrmfb. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This is the last message displayed before the system hangs. This seems >>>>>>> to be hitting a large number of users in Fedora, though certainly not >>>>>>> everyone. This started happening with the 3.5 updates, and is still an >>>>>>> issue. It appears to be a race condition, because various things have >>>>>>> allowed boot to continue for some users, though there is no clear work >>>>>>> around. Has anyone else run across this? Any ideas. For more >>>>>>> background we have the following bugs: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> inteldrmfb: >>>>>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843826 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> radeondrmfb: >>>>>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845745 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> cirrusdrmfb : >>>>>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843860 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It should be noted that the conflicting fb hw usage message is not new, >>>>>>> it has been around for a while, but this is the last message seen before >>>>>>> the hang. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, (adding dri-devel mailing list) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I started seeing this problem on 3.5-rc6. >>>>>> >>>>>> AFAICT, the system is not actually hung, it's just that no output >>>>>> is showing up on the real (physical) output device (display) -- it's >>>>>> going somewhere else (or to the bit bucket). >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Can we bisect this at all? >>> >>> I guess I'll have to try again. My first attempt did not >>> prove anything, I think because the conflict does not happen >>> 100% of the time (i.e., it feels like a timing problem). >>> >>>>> I worry the intel one will bisect to where we moved the conflict >>>>> resolution earlier, but I'd like to see if applying that patch earlier >>>>> causes the issue, since radeon has it. >>> >>> Do you know of a specific commit that I could revert and test? >> >> 9f846a16d213523fbe6daea17e20df6b8ac5a1e5 >> >> might work, but it just changes the timing mostly. >> >> also testing 3.4 with that on top would be good. > > > That commit doesn't apply cleanly to 3.4, but reverting > it on 3.5-rc6 (where I first saw the problem) allows me to boot > 3.5-rc6 multiple times without a problem. > > Maybe Justin can get more stable testing done also.. Randy do you have a vga= on your kernel command line? Dave. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/