Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 18:58:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 18:58:26 -0400 Received: from air-2.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:41743 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 18:58:25 -0400 Message-Id: <200208272302.g7RN2ZN18550@mail.osdl.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 To: conman@kolivas.net cc: Daniel Phillips , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cliffw@osdl.org Subject: Re: VM changes added to performance patches for 2.4.19 In-Reply-To: Message from conman@kolivas.net of "Sun, 25 Aug 2002 00:36:49 +1000." <1030199809.3d679a012042b@kolivas.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 16:02:35 -0700 From: Cliff White Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1810 Lines: 43 > Quoting Daniel Phillips : > > Would you be so kind as to attempt to quantify that? > > Ummm... I'm not sure if you're making fun or me? I haven't done any objective > tests so I can't quantify it ?? > > I just found the responsiveness of the machine a little better and don't have > the resources, time or inclination to test it with a benchmark. It's my > understanding that the -aa patch performed better on benchmarks, but that some > people reported the responsiveness was better with -rmap anyway. I'd agree with > the latter statement. I offer both patches with mine so if people want to try my > patch and feel strongly either way they can choose. My aim is to optimise system > response for single cpu desktops, not multi cpu servers. > > Con. > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > Con, Thanks for the work, and nice web page! To help with the testing, i have taken the liberty of adding your 2.4.19-ck3 patch to the OSDL's Patch LifeCycle Manager. It's patch # 768. I've queued up a couple of the basic tests against it, (dbench, dbt1 ) If you want to add future versions and get some testing run, see http://osdl.org/cgi-bin/plm - it's really easy, and you can use OSDL to make up for your lack of hardware. We do focus more on multi-cpu systems, but we're always interested in scheduler tests. cliffw - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/