Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 16:55:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 16:55:28 -0500 Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU ([129.94.242.29]:57607 "HELO note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 16:55:18 -0500 From: Neil Brown To: "Michael J. Dikkema" Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 08:24:32 +1100 (EST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14911.53776.854761.710519@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.2.18 question (fh_lock_parent) In-Reply-To: message from Michael J. Dikkema on Tuesday December 19 In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under Emacs 20.7.2 X-face: [Gw_3E*Gng}4rRrKRYotwlE?.2|**#s9D > I've been getting tonnes of these since I installed 2.2.18. Is this a > problem? Should I even worry about this? If I don't need to worry about > it, is there a way to stop displaying this message? > > fh_lock_parent: mqueue/xfBAA14279 parent changed or child unhashed > fh_lock_parent: mqueue/xfBAA16413 parent changed or child unhashed You are running sendmail on an NFS client with /var/spool mounted off the NFS server which is giving these message - right? These messages tend to indicate a race between two different NFS requests that try to do something to the one file - probably unlink it, though possibly rename it. If everything is configured properly (e.g. you don't have two different sendmails on two different clients trying to use the one shared spool area), then this would seem to imply that the server is responding more slowly that the client would like, and the client is resending the unlink (or whatever) request and so there are two identical requests being served by the NFS server and they race. So it is hard to be sure if you should worry about this. Maybe if you tell us what you are trying to do (i.e. confirm the configuration of sendmail, NFS mounts and the number of clients. Also, how frequent is this? Would you be able to get a tcpdump of a few hundred packets either side of the message? If you do try this, make sure that you use a large snap-length for tcpdump (-s 1024) to get the whole nfs packet. NeilBrown > > ,.;:: > : Michael J. Dikkema > | Systems / Network Admin - Internet Solutions, Inc. > | http://www.moot.ca Work: (204) 982-1060 > ; mjd@moot.ca > ',. > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/