Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754971Ab2HUOfJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Aug 2012 10:35:09 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:54876 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754738Ab2HUOfF (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Aug 2012 10:35:05 -0400 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Michael Thalmeier Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 2/2] fix printk flush of messages Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 14:30:18 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <4FB44EF1.9050809@am.sony.com> <4FB44FD0.4090800@am.sony.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 83.64.51.210 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/14.0.1) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1665 Lines: 48 Frank Rowand am.sony.com> writes: > > > Updates console-make-rt-friendly.patch > > #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL, printk() output is never flushed by > printk() because: > ... > > On system boot some printk() output is flushed because register_console() > and tty_open() call console_unlock(). > > This change also fixes the problem that was previously fixed by > preempt-rt-allow-immediate-magic-sysrq-output-for-preempt_rt_full.patch > > Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand am.sony.com> > > --- > kernel/printk.c | 2 1 + 1 - 0 ! > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > Index: b/kernel/printk.c > =================================================================== > --- a/kernel/printk.c > +++ b/kernel/printk.c > @@ -847,7 +847,7 @@ static int console_trylock_for_printk(un > int retval = 0, wake = 0; > #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL > int lock = !early_boot_irqs_disabled && !irqs_disabled_flags(flags) && > - !preempt_count(); > + (preempt_count() <= 1); > #else > int lock = 1; > #endif > > I have seen that this patch is applied in the 3.4 stable rt series. As we are using the 3.0 stable rt kernel I have tested this patch on this kernel series (on a Freescale i.MX31 based board) and have not found any problems so far. Is there something I have missed why this patch has not found its way in the 3.0 series ? Thanks in advance, Michael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/