Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 23:59:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 23:59:52 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:6037 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 23:59:52 -0400 Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 20:58:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20020827.205830.72711261.davem@redhat.com> To: ldb@ldb.ods.org Cc: s.biggs@softier.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Bug in kernel code? From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <1030507070.1489.32.camel@ldb> References: <3D6BD62C.581.ACEBAD@localhost> <20020827.203946.102043898.davem@redhat.com> <1030507070.1489.32.camel@ldb> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 753 Lines: 20 From: Luca Barbieri Date: 28 Aug 2002 05:57:50 +0200 On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 05:39, David S. Miller wrote: > Realistically possible with any known configuration? How about replacing the loop with ffs/__ffs that would be more elegant, shorter and avoid any problem or doubt? This is getting rediculious. You can pursue this further if you want, but I think we've wasted enough time with this non-bug. Who is getting bootup failures due to this problem? Answer: nobody - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/