Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 01:31:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 01:31:32 -0400 Received: from niobium.golden.net ([199.166.210.90]:36599 "EHLO niobium.golden.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 01:31:30 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 01:35:20 -0400 From: "John L. Males" To: David Weinehall Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re[04]: GPG/PGP-signatures Message-Id: <20020828013520.4a21fc8c.jlmales@yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20020827233229.GC12587@khan.acc.umu.se> References: <20020827125914.2eae144a.jlmales@yahoo.com> <20020827233229.GC12587@khan.acc.umu.se> Reply-To: jlmales@yahoo.com Organization: Toronto, Ontario - Canada X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.8 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu-Patched-SrtRecipient-SMTPAuthNDateSmartAcct) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=.ux1szHYbrEi(QR" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 5652 Lines: 159 --=.ux1szHYbrEi(QR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi David, Comments below ... ********** Reply Seperator ********** On Wed, 28 Aug 2002 01:32:29 +0200 On (Wed) 2002-08-28 01:32:29 +0200 David Weinehall wrote in Message-ID: 20020827233229.GC12587@khan.acc.umu.se To: "John L. Males" From: David Weinehall Subject: Re: GPG/PGP-signatures Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 01:32:29 +0200 > On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 12:59:14PM -0400, John L. Males wrote: > > David, > > > > I just discovered your eMail posting on "GPG/PGP-signatures" of 14 > > August 2002. Your eMail indicated that I was BCC'ed in. I can > > advise you I did not receive a copy of this posting. > > Sorry, probably missed you out. No problem. Just thought wyou might like to know in case you were unaware of a technical problem. > > > I have checked the key server and find the key for the ID of this > > eMail note to be there. I did eMAil you back after loading my key > > to confirm that I had correctly uploaded my GPG key to the key > > server. My PGP keys have been on the keyserver for some time. I > > use PGP on Windows NT when it is working (Been down since Mid > > may), and GPG on Linux. At some point I will manage to move over > > to GPG keys on NT. I would be happy to upload my other GPG keys > > to the key server once I am certain I have uploaded my keys > > correctly. > > > > Would you be so kind as to confirm I have uploaded my key for the > > below noted eMail address ID. Sorry of the manner I am using for > > hiding my eMail address makes things difficult, but at 20- 30 SPAM > > eMails a day I had to take action to prevent further abuse of my > > eMail addresses. > > The key you signed this e-mail with (6eeaf716) is available on > wwwkeys.pgp.net, but I cannot find your other key (99ed3565), and > this was the key listed as missing in my original post. Ok, the other key is now up and should be making it way to the other key servers. I did not post the 0x99ed3565 key, as I had not heard of the 0x6eeaf716 key was loaded correctly. > > Spam is something that affects us all. Use procmail and/or > spamassassin. Probably works better anyway, because sooner or later > your address will end up in some e-mail... There are other solutions. For now I need to use this solution until I have the current matter purged and under control before using a more effective solution beyond filtering. > > > Regards: David Weinehall > -- > /> David Weinehall /> Northern lights wander > <\ > // Maintainer of the v2.0 kernel // Dance across the winter sky > //\> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/