Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933409Ab2HVVz6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Aug 2012 17:55:58 -0400 Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:54495 "EHLO cavan.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932343Ab2HVVzz (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Aug 2012 17:55:55 -0400 Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 22:55:43 +0100 From: Matthew Garrett To: Wim Van Sebroeck Cc: Len Brown , Feng Tang , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Aaron Sierra , Bob Moore , Samuel Ortiz , Guenter Roeck Subject: Re: [PATCH] lpc_ich: Fix a 3.5 kernel regression for iTCO_wdt driver Message-ID: <20120822215543.GA1954@srcf.ucam.org> References: <1344959772-23018-1-git-send-email-feng.tang@intel.com> <20120822195512.GI27604@spo001.leaseweb.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120822195512.GI27604@spo001.leaseweb.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mjg59@cavan.codon.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on cavan.codon.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 620 Lines: 15 On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 09:55:12PM +0200, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote: > Any idea why the acpi_check_resource_conflict() check gives a conflict? Because the resource range is declared in ACPI and we assume that that means the firmware wants to scribble on it. We'd need the output of acpidump to work out whether that's safe or not. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/