Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933700Ab2HWJa6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Aug 2012 05:30:58 -0400 Received: from antcom.de ([188.40.178.216]:52945 "EHLO chuck.antcom.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932259Ab2HWJa4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Aug 2012 05:30:56 -0400 Message-ID: <5035F84E.3000901@antcom.de> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 11:30:54 +0200 From: Roland Stigge Organization: ANTCOM IT Research & Development User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.5) Gecko/20120624 Icedove/10.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , s.hauer@pengutronix.de Subject: mxc_nand.c on mach-imx/imx53 X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 OpenPGP: url=subkeys.pgp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 888 Lines: 24 Hi, I'd like to know about the current state of mxc_nand.c on imx53, because I got an error on probe() because the clock that mxc_nand is requesting is "nfc" but imx53 only defines the clock "mxc_nand". Even after adjusting the name, probe() couldn't find the clock, so I'm wondering if mxc_nand.c is supported on imx53 at all because other mx'es have IMX_HAVE_PLATFORM_MXC_NAND in arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig but not imx53. In a custom board BSP, I found an mxc_nd2.c besides mxc_nand.c but not in mainline. Are there any plans here? But maybe I just missed sth. - a hint or link would be very much appreciated. Thanks in advance, Roland -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/