Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 10:21:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 10:21:16 -0400 Received: from mail.coastside.net ([207.213.212.6]:59265 "EHLO mail.coastside.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 10:21:15 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20020828074148.B23738@hq.fsmlabs.com> References: <20020827145631.B877@hq.fsmlabs.com> <20020828074148.B23738@hq.fsmlabs.com> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 07:25:01 -0700 To: yodaiken@fsmlabs.com, "Richard B. Johnson" From: Jonathan Lundell Subject: Re: interrupt latency Cc: yodaiken@fsmlabs.com, Mark Hounschell , "Wessler, Siegfried" , "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 572 Lines: 14 At 7:41 am -0600 8/28/02, yodaiken@fsmlabs.com wrote: >Average and worst case are different. I can believe that. The explanation that jumps to mind is PCI bus contention because of DMA, causing the inb to stall or to get repeatedly retried. 13us seems a little extreme, but not completely impossible. -- /Jonathan Lundell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/