Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932360Ab2HXI0z (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Aug 2012 04:26:55 -0400 Received: from LGEMRELSE7Q.lge.com ([156.147.1.151]:61621 "EHLO LGEMRELSE7Q.lge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932208Ab2HXI0t (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Aug 2012 04:26:49 -0400 X-AuditID: 9c930197-b7b93ae0000028a7-a6-50373ac67056 From: Namhyung Kim To: pjt@google.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Vaidyanathan Srinivasan , Srivatsa Vaddagiri , Kamalesh Babulal , Venki Pallipadi , Ben Segall , Mike Galbraith , Vincent Guittot , Nikunj A Dadhania , Morten Rasmussen , "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: Re: [patch 01/16] sched: track the runnable average on a per-task entitiy basis References: <20120823141422.444396696@google.com> <20120823141506.372695337@google.com> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 17:20:10 +0900 In-Reply-To: <20120823141506.372695337@google.com> (pjt@google.com's message of "Thu, 23 Aug 2012 07:14:23 -0700") Message-ID: <87mx1khfb9.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 8666 Lines: 275 Hi, Just typos below.. On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 07:14:23 -0700, > From: Paul Turner > > Instead of tracking averaging the load parented by a cfs_rq, we can track > entity load directly. With the load for a given cfs_rq then being the sum of > its children. > > To do this we represent the historical contribution to runnable average within each > trailing 1024us of execution as the coefficients of a geometric series. > > We can express this for a given task t as: > runnable_sum(t) = \Sum u_i * y^i, runnable_avg_period(t) = \Sum 1024 * y^i > load(t) = weight_t * runnable_sum(t) / runnable_avg_period(t) > > Where: u_i is the usage in the last i`th 1024us period (approximately 1ms) ~ms > and y is chosen such that y^k = 1/2. We currently choose k to be 32 which > roughly translates to about a sched period. > > Signed-off-by: Paul Turner > Reviewed-by: Ben Segall > --- > include/linux/sched.h | 13 +++++ > kernel/sched/core.c | 5 ++ > kernel/sched/debug.c | 4 ++ > kernel/sched/fair.c | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 4 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h > index f3eebc1..f553da9 100644 > --- a/include/linux/sched.h > +++ b/include/linux/sched.h > @@ -1139,6 +1139,16 @@ struct load_weight { > unsigned long weight, inv_weight; > }; > > +struct sched_avg { > + /* > + * These sums represent an infinite geometric series and so are bound > + * above by 1024/(1-y). Thus we only need a u32 to store them for for all > + * choices of y < 1-2^(-32)*1024. > + */ > + u32 runnable_avg_sum, runnable_avg_period; > + u64 last_runnable_update; > +}; > + > #ifdef CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS > struct sched_statistics { > u64 wait_start; > @@ -1199,6 +1209,9 @@ struct sched_entity { > /* rq "owned" by this entity/group: */ > struct cfs_rq *my_q; > #endif > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP > + struct sched_avg avg; > +#endif > }; > > struct sched_rt_entity { > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c > index 78d9c96..fcc3cad 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c > @@ -1556,6 +1556,11 @@ static void __sched_fork(struct task_struct *p) > p->se.vruntime = 0; > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->se.group_node); > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP > + p->se.avg.runnable_avg_period = 0; > + p->se.avg.runnable_avg_sum = 0; > +#endif > + > #ifdef CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS > memset(&p->se.statistics, 0, sizeof(p->se.statistics)); > #endif > diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c > index 6f79596..61f7097 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/debug.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c > @@ -85,6 +85,10 @@ static void print_cfs_group_stats(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct task_group > P(se->statistics.wait_count); > #endif > P(se->load.weight); > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP > + P(se->avg.runnable_avg_sum); > + P(se->avg.runnable_avg_period); > +#endif > #undef PN > #undef P > } > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c > index 01d3eda..2c53263 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c > @@ -971,6 +971,125 @@ static inline void update_entity_shares_tick(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) > } > #endif /* CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED */ > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP > +/* > + * Approximate: > + * val * y^n, where y^32 ~= 0.5 (~1 scheduling period) > + */ > +static __always_inline u64 decay_load(u64 val, u64 n) > +{ > + for (; n && val; n--) { > + val *= 4008; > + val >>= 12; > + } > + > + return val; > +} > + > +/* We can represent the historical contribution to runnable average as the > + * coefficients of a geometric series. To do this we sub-divide our runnable > + * history into segments of approximately 1ms (1024us); label the segment that > + * occurred N-ms ago p_N, with p_0 corresponding to the current period, e.g. > + * > + * [<- 1024us ->|<- 1024us ->|<- 1024us ->| ... > + * p0 p1 p1 Should it be p2 ? > + * (now) (~1ms ago) (~2ms ago) > + * > + * Let u_i denote the fraction of p_i that the entity was runnable. > + * > + * We then designate the fractions u_i as our co-efficients, yielding the > + * following representation of historical load: > + * u_0 + u_1*y + u_2*y^2 + u_3*y^3 + ... > + * > + * We choose y based on the with of a reasonably scheduling period, fixing: > + * y^32 = 0.5 > + * > + * This means that the contribution to load ~32ms ago (u_32) will be weighted > + * approximately half as much as the contribution to load within the last ms > + * (u_0). > + * > + * When a period "rolls over" and we have new u_0`, multiplying the previous > + * sum again by y is sufficient to update: > + * load_avg = u_0` + y*(u_0 + u_1*y + u_2*y^2 + ... ) > + * = u_0 + u_1*y + u_2*y^2 + ... [re-labeling u_i --> u_{i+1] s/u_{i+1]/u_{i+1}]/ Thanks, Namhyung > + */ > +static __always_inline int __update_entity_runnable_avg(u64 now, > + struct sched_avg *sa, > + int runnable) > +{ > + u64 delta; > + int delta_w, decayed = 0; > + > + delta = now - sa->last_runnable_update; > + /* > + * This should only happen when time goes backwards, which it > + * unfortunately does during sched clock init when we swap over to TSC. > + */ > + if ((s64)delta < 0) { > + sa->last_runnable_update = now; > + return 0; > + } > + > + /* > + * Use 1024ns as the unit of measurement since it's a reasonable > + * approximation of 1us and fast to compute. > + */ > + delta >>= 10; > + if (!delta) > + return 0; > + sa->last_runnable_update = now; > + > + /* delta_w is the amount already accumulated against our next period */ > + delta_w = sa->runnable_avg_period % 1024; > + if (delta + delta_w >= 1024) { > + /* period roll-over */ > + decayed = 1; > + > + /* > + * Now that we know we're crossing a period boundary, figure > + * out how much from delta we need to complete the current > + * period and accrue it. > + */ > + delta_w = 1024 - delta_w; > + BUG_ON(delta_w > delta); > + do { > + if (runnable) > + sa->runnable_avg_sum += delta_w; > + sa->runnable_avg_period += delta_w; > + > + /* > + * Remainder of delta initiates a new period, roll over > + * the previous. > + */ > + sa->runnable_avg_sum = > + decay_load(sa->runnable_avg_sum, 1); > + sa->runnable_avg_period = > + decay_load(sa->runnable_avg_period, 1); > + > + delta -= delta_w; > + /* New period is empty */ > + delta_w = 1024; > + } while (delta >= 1024); > + } > + > + /* Remainder of delta accrued against u_0` */ > + if (runnable) > + sa->runnable_avg_sum += delta; > + sa->runnable_avg_period += delta; > + > + return decayed; > +} > + > +/* Update a sched_entity's runnable average */ > +static inline void update_entity_load_avg(struct sched_entity *se) > +{ > + __update_entity_runnable_avg(rq_of(cfs_rq_of(se))->clock_task, &se->avg, > + se->on_rq); > +} > +#else > +static inline void update_entity_load_avg(struct sched_entity *se) {} > +#endif > + > static void enqueue_sleeper(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se) > { > #ifdef CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS > @@ -1097,6 +1216,7 @@ enqueue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags) > */ > update_curr(cfs_rq); > update_cfs_load(cfs_rq, 0); > + update_entity_load_avg(se); > account_entity_enqueue(cfs_rq, se); > update_cfs_shares(cfs_rq); > > @@ -1171,6 +1291,7 @@ dequeue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags) > * Update run-time statistics of the 'current'. > */ > update_curr(cfs_rq); > + update_entity_load_avg(se); > > update_stats_dequeue(cfs_rq, se); > if (flags & DEQUEUE_SLEEP) { > @@ -1340,6 +1461,8 @@ static void put_prev_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *prev) > update_stats_wait_start(cfs_rq, prev); > /* Put 'current' back into the tree. */ > __enqueue_entity(cfs_rq, prev); > + /* in !on_rq case, update occurred at dequeue */ > + update_entity_load_avg(prev); > } > cfs_rq->curr = NULL; > } > @@ -1353,6 +1476,11 @@ entity_tick(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *curr, int queued) > update_curr(cfs_rq); > > /* > + * Ensure that runnable average is periodically updated. > + */ > + update_entity_load_avg(curr); > + > + /* > * Update share accounting for long-running entities. > */ > update_entity_shares_tick(cfs_rq); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/