Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932458Ab2HXQOX (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Aug 2012 12:14:23 -0400 Received: from mail1-hoer.fullrate.dk ([89.150.129.84]:63261 "EHLO smtp.fullrate.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759647Ab2HXQOU (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Aug 2012 12:14:20 -0400 From: Martin Nybo Andersen To: wbrana Subject: Re: Drop support for x86-32 Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 18:14:16 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.6.0-rc2+; KDE/4.8.4; i686; ; ) Cc: Bernd Petrovitsch , Ondrej Zary , "linux-kernel" References: <1345823281.28613.34.camel@thorin> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201208241814.16862.tweek@tweek.dk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 803 Lines: 21 On Friday 24 August 2012 17:55:08 wbrana wrote: > On 8/24/12, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote: > > You really think that there are no 32bit x86-compatible CPUs in the > > embedded world? > > x86-32 would be supported by long term tree until all x86-32 CPU disappear Ahh..., so the development time saved by not supporting x86-32 in mainline can now be used by backporting new features to the forementioned long term tree? (And I'm still not sure why one would run 32-bit applications on a 64-bit architecture...) -- Cheers, Martin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/