Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 21:16:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 21:16:08 -0500 Received: from smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.4.62]:47356 "EHLO smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 21:15:51 -0500 Message-ID: <3A400F2A.E5CD52BA@haque.net> Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 20:45:14 -0500 From: "Mohammad A. Haque" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0-test12 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru CC: "David S. Miller" , tleete@mountain.net, laforge@gnumonks.org, rusty@linuxcare.com.au, netfilter-devel@us5.samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ip_defrag / ip_conntrack issues (was Re: [PATCH] Fix netfilter In-Reply-To: <200012191454.RAA13529@ms2.inr.ac.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org how is this meaningless? This just confirms what I and others have found in test12 wrt to the netfilter issue. kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru wrote: > > Hello! > > > able to lockup/OOPS his machine by logging into X as a user who had > > his home directory over NFS. > > I believe this report is to be ignored. It is fully meaningless. > X has nothing to do with NFS, NFS is with X, and defragmenter is > at least with one of them. -- ===================================================================== Mohammad A. Haque http://www.haque.net/ mhaque@haque.net "Alcohol and calculus don't mix. Project Lead Don't drink and derive." --Unknown http://wm.themes.org/ batmanppc@themes.org ===================================================================== - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/