Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 16:36:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 16:36:12 -0400 Received: from dsl-213-023-022-149.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.22.149]:40395 "EHLO starship") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 16:36:11 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: "Christian Ehrhardt" Subject: Re: MM patches against 2.5.31 Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 22:41:49 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: Andrew Morton , lkml , "linux-mm@kvack.org" References: <3D644C70.6D100EA5@zip.com.au> <20020828131445.25959.qmail@thales.mathematik.uni-ulm.de> In-Reply-To: <20020828131445.25959.qmail@thales.mathematik.uni-ulm.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 386 Lines: 10 Going right back to basics, what do you suppose is wrong with the 2.4 strategy of always doing the lru removal in free_pages_ok? -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/