Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753880Ab2H0ROn (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2012 13:14:43 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]:49381 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753659Ab2H0ROm (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2012 13:14:42 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,321,1344236400"; d="scan'208";a="185421330" Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 10:14:38 -0700 From: Andi Kleen To: Cyrill Gorcunov Cc: X86-ML , LKML , "H. Peter Anvin" , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Brian Gerst , Peter Zijlstra , Pekka Enberg Subject: Re: [RFC] x86: drop unnecessary kernel_eflags variable from 64 bit Message-ID: <20120827171438.GA17289@tassilo.jf.intel.com> References: <20120824195847.GA31628@moon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120824195847.GA31628@moon> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 777 Lines: 20 On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:58:47PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > Hi guys, > > I've been looking for some particular email in my mailbox when > found the patch below (it's dated as August 2011 ;) and think > it's still valid for kernel. Actually there were two patches, > and the second patch was unifying x86-32 with x86-64 but it > was doable as far as I remember. Patch is fine for me. I did the original code, but you're right it's unlikely the EFLAGS will ever be extended. Acked-by: Andi Kleen -Andi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/