Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 20:26:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 20:26:18 -0400 Received: from sex.inr.ac.ru ([193.233.7.165]:45703 "HELO sex.inr.ac.ru") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 20:26:17 -0400 From: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru Message-Id: <200208290032.EAA25255@sex.inr.ac.ru> Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPv6 Prefix List support for 2.5.31 To: kumarkr@us.ibm.com (Krishna Kumar) Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 04:32:22 +0400 (MSD) Cc: linux-net@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com In-Reply-To: from "Krishna Kumar" at Aug 28, 2 04:55:35 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 730 Lines: 24 Hello! > - Routing table will have lots of address prefixes that are not available > to the local interface addresses. Well, all the direct routes are prefixes by definition. > - To be a prefix list entry, it should come via an RA. Wrong. But this does not matter, RA routes may be tagged with a flag. > - Also, the search over a longer routing table across all nodes is more > time consuming. Do you jest? You compare linear search with lookup in radix tree. :-) Alexey - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/