Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 22:25:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 22:25:58 -0400 Received: from dp.samba.org ([66.70.73.150]:42371 "EHLO lists.samba.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 22:25:57 -0400 From: Rusty Russell To: Ingo Molnar Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [patch] "fully HT-aware scheduler" support, 2.5.31-BK-curr In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 28 Aug 2002 19:16:31 +0200." Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 11:28:16 +1000 Message-Id: <20020828213041.1BB3E2C152@lists.samba.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1034 Lines: 29 In message you write: > > On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Rusty Russell wrote: > > > > - HT-aware affinity. > > > > > > Tasks should attempt to 'stick' to physical CPUs, not logical CPUs. > > > > Linus disagreed with this before when I discussed it with him, and with > > the current (stupid, non-portable, broken) set_affinity syscall he's > > right. > > actually, affinity still works just fine, users can bind tasks to logical > CPUs as well. What i meant was the affinity logic of the scheduler (ie. > affinity decisions done by the scheduler), not the externally visible > affinity API. My bad. I'll shut up now, and read the patch. Sorry, Rusty. -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/