Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 04:14:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 04:14:09 -0400 Received: from neckar.ipht-jena.de ([194.94.32.118]:1540 "EHLO diamond.ipht-jena.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 04:14:09 -0400 Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 10:15:33 +0200 From: Axel Siebenwirth To: Gregoire Favre Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Why it would be good to have AC interdiff patches Message-ID: <20020829081533.GA541@diamond.ipht-jena.de> Mail-Followup-To: Gregoire Favre , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20020829074759.GC851@ulima.unil.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020829074759.GC851@ulima.unil.ch> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: hh59.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 551 Lines: 18 Hi Gregoire! Gregoire Favre schrieb am Thursday, den 29. August 2002: > 3) The time for compilation would be smaller as you modify less files. Somebody wrote me one time that it is always a good thing to make an "mrproper" after I have applied a patch to kernel sources. Is that right? Thank you, Axel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/