Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752544Ab2JAPeb (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Oct 2012 11:34:31 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:49149 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751641Ab2JAPe3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Oct 2012 11:34:29 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,517,1344236400"; d="scan'208";a="228623224" Message-ID: <5069B804.6040902@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 08:34:28 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120605 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrea Arcangeli CC: "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Andrew Morton , linux-mm@kvack.org, Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Arnd Bergmann , Ingo Molnar , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Virtual huge zero page References: <1348875441-19561-1-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> <20120929134811.GC26989@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20120929134811.GC26989@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1180 Lines: 30 On 09/29/2012 06:48 AM, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > There would be a small cache benefit here... but even then some first > level caches are virtually indexed IIRC (always physically tagged to > avoid the software to notice) and virtually indexed ones won't get any > benefit. > Not quite. The virtual indexing is limited to a few bits (e.g. three bits on K8); the right way to deal with that is to color the zeropage, both the regular one and the virtual one (the virtual one would circle through all the colors repeatedly.) The cache difference, therefore, is *huge*. > I guess it won't make a whole lot of difference but my preference is > for the previous implementation that always guaranteed huge TLB > entries whenever possible. Said that I'm fine either ways so if > somebody has strong reasons for wanting this one, I'd like to hear > about it. It's a performance tradeoff, and it can, and should, be measured. -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/