Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752605Ab2JBHRZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Oct 2012 03:17:25 -0400 Received: from mail-ob0-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174]:60511 "EHLO mail-ob0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751525Ab2JBHRX (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Oct 2012 03:17:23 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [178.83.130.250] In-Reply-To: <6616255.1baV4zcIkN@tux200s> References: <2372445.fuIXicT4H0@tux200s> <20120930143201.GA22107@kroah.com> <6616255.1baV4zcIkN@tux200s> Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 09:17:22 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: XrK-x2GUVSUxGOWm2Sh9ZchKqPs Message-ID: Subject: Re: Re: 3.4.10 i915 [GM45] regression From: Daniel Vetter To: Andreas Sturmlechner Cc: Greg KH , Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski , stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 954 Lines: 22 On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 11:56 PM, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: >> Andreas, can you please check whether 3.5.x works for you, just to >> make sure that this particular elephant is only wreaking havoc in 3.4 >> and earlier? > > I've been using 3.5 all the time since .0, I never had any trouble there - a few reboots just now with a vanilla 3.5.4 image were > successful as expected. Meanwhile I have upgraded to 3.6, zero issues as well. So 3.5 and later really don't seem to have any issue with this patch. I'm as puzzled as ever. Thanks for testing this again. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/