Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752906Ab2JBUWc (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Oct 2012 16:22:32 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.220.46]:35545 "EHLO mail-pa0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752545Ab2JBUWa (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Oct 2012 16:22:30 -0400 Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 13:22:27 -0700 From: Kent Overstreet To: Vivek Goyal Cc: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, tj@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v3 11/26] block: Add submit_bio_wait(), remove from md Message-ID: <20121002202227.GO26488@google.com> References: <1348526106-17074-1-git-send-email-koverstreet@google.com> <1348526106-17074-12-git-send-email-koverstreet@google.com> <20121002194132.GF3283@redhat.com> <20121002201105.GL26488@google.com> <20121002201630.GI758@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121002201630.GI758@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1380 Lines: 29 On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 04:16:30PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: > On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 01:11:05PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 03:41:32PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 03:34:51PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote: > > > > Random cleanup - this code was duplicated and it's not really specific > > > > to md. > > > > > > > > Also added the ability to return the actual error code. > > > > > > Who is going to make use of actual error code and why checking > > > BIO_UPTODATE is not sufficient (as existing code is doing)? > > > > Some things do, though it's not common and I forget where I saw it - > > checking for -ENOTSUPPORTED vs. other stuff > > May be we can introduce "submit_bio_ret" stuff when we find the actual > user in the series. Justifying code change becomes easier. Eh, IMO as generic code it's just better/more sensible that way; bio_endio() does pass an actual error code, so the sync version should pass it up too. Otherwise it's a needless inconsistency. Honestly I would prefer sticking an error field in struct bio. That'd be useful for other things, too. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/