Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 14:39:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 14:39:31 -0400 Received: from brmx1.fl.icn.siemens.com ([12.147.96.32]:11481 "EHLO brmx1.fl.icn.siemens.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 14:39:30 -0400 Message-ID: <180577A42806D61189D30008C7E632E8793A25@boca213a.boca.ssc.siemens.com> From: "Bloch, Jack" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 14:43:52 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 973 Lines: 23 I have an embedded system runing a 2.4.18-3 Kernel. It runs from a 256MB compact flash disk (emulates an IDE interface). I am using an EXT2 filesystem. During some power-off/power-on testing, the disk check failed. It dropped me to a shell and I had to run e2fsck -cfv to correct this problem. This is all good and well in a lab environment, but in reality, there is nobody there to perform the repair (running system is not equipped with keyboard and monitor). Is there any way to invoke e2fsck automatically or inhibit the failure detection mechanism? Please CC me directly on any responses. Thanks in advance.... Jack Bloch Siemens ICN phone (561) 923-6550 e-mail jack.bloch@icn.siemens.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/