Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932185Ab2JEKal (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Oct 2012 06:30:41 -0400 Received: from bear.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.41]:35537 "EHLO bear.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932067Ab2JEKaj (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Oct 2012 06:30:39 -0400 Message-ID: <506EB6B7.4050705@ti.com> Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 16:00:15 +0530 From: Sekhar Nori User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matt Porter CC: Linux DaVinci Kernel List , Russell King , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "Hans J. Koch" , Linux ARM Kernel List Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] ARM: davinci: Add support for PRUSS on DA850 References: <1349276133-26408-1-git-send-email-mporter@ti.com> <1349276133-26408-6-git-send-email-mporter@ti.com> <506D7F95.2030401@ti.com> <20121004163546.GK11149@beef> In-Reply-To: <20121004163546.GK11149@beef> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1760 Lines: 41 On 10/4/2012 10:05 PM, Matt Porter wrote: > On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 05:52:45PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote: >> On 10/3/2012 8:25 PM, Matt Porter wrote: >>> +static struct clk pruss_clk = { >>> + .name = "pruss", >>> + .parent = &pll0_sysclk2, >>> + .lpsc = DA8XX_LPSC0_PRUSS, >>> +}; >>> + >>> static struct clk uart0_clk = { >>> .name = "uart0", >>> .parent = &pll0_sysclk2, >>> @@ -378,6 +384,7 @@ static struct clk_lookup da850_clks[] = { >>> CLK(NULL, "tptc1", &tptc1_clk), >>> CLK(NULL, "tpcc1", &tpcc1_clk), >>> CLK(NULL, "tptc2", &tptc2_clk), >>> + CLK(NULL, "pruss", &pruss_clk), >> >> This is actually incorrect since we should use device name rather than >> con_id for matching the clock. If there is just one clock that the >> driver needs, connection id should be NULL. Looking at the driver now, >> the clk_get() call seems to pass a valid device pointer. So, I wonder >> how you are able to look up the clock even with a NULL device name. > > I doublechecked the clk_get() find implentation to confirm that I indeed > did get lucky here. Since pruss has only one instance and the clk_find() > implementation looks for the best found match, it's able to find the > clock just by the con_id, though it's not the "best possible" match in > the find implementation...it's the "best found" match.. As you noted, > this is incorrect though for a clock expected to be used from a driver > context so I will address this in the update. Thanks for debugging and clarifying. Regards, Sekhar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/