Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755305Ab2JFNI6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Oct 2012 09:08:58 -0400 Received: from mail-vc0-f174.google.com ([209.85.220.174]:33091 "EHLO mail-vc0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754777Ab2JFNI4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Oct 2012 09:08:56 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1349496603-20775-1-git-send-email-cheiny@synaptics.com> <1349496603-20775-3-git-send-email-cheiny@synaptics.com> <1349525982.2008.86.camel@joe-AO722> Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2012 09:08:55 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 02/06] input/rmi4: Core files From: "devendra.aaru" To: Joe Perches Cc: Christopher Heiny , Dmitry Torokhov , Jean Delvare , Linux Kernel , Linux Input , Allie Xiong , Vivian Ly , Daniel Rosenberg , Alexandra Chen , Joerie de Gram , Wolfram Sang , Mathieu Poirier , Linus Walleij , Naveen Kumar Gaddipati Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1958 Lines: 52 On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 9:06 AM, devendra.aaru wrote: > On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 8:19 AM, Joe Perches wrote: >> On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 21:09 -0700, Christopher Heiny wrote: >> [] >> >> Just some trivial comments: >> >>> diff --git a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_driver.c b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_driver.c >> [] >>> @@ -0,0 +1,1529 @@ >> [] >>> +static ssize_t delay_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *buffer, >>> + size_t size, loff_t *offset) { >>> + struct driver_debugfs_data *data = filp->private_data; >>> + struct rmi_device_platform_data *pdata = >>> + data->rmi_dev->phys->dev->platform_data; >>> + int retval; >>> + char local_buf[size]; >>> + unsigned int new_read_delay; >>> + unsigned int new_write_delay; >>> + unsigned int new_block_delay; >>> + unsigned int new_pre_delay; >>> + unsigned int new_post_delay; >>> + >>> + retval = copy_from_user(local_buf, buffer, size); >>> + if (retval) >>> + return -EFAULT; >>> + >>> + retval = sscanf(local_buf, "%u %u %u %u %u", &new_read_delay, >>> + &new_write_delay, &new_block_delay, >>> + &new_pre_delay, &new_post_delay); >>> + if (retval != 5) { >>> + dev_err(&data->rmi_dev->dev, >>> + "Incorrect number of values provided for delay."); >>> + return -EINVAL; >>> + } >>> + if (new_read_delay < 0) { >> >> These are unnecessary tests as unsigned values are never < 0. >> > Oops, i m sorry, i mistakenly took the variable as int, it should be unsinged int. sorry joe, you are right the are never < 0. Thanks, -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/