Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754748Ab2JHTIy (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Oct 2012 15:08:54 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:43361 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754594Ab2JHTIw (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Oct 2012 15:08:52 -0400 Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 21:10:05 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: dl8bcu@dl8bcu.de, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, Richard Henderson , Ivan Kokshaysky , Matt Turner , Al Viro Subject: Re: [regression] boot failure on alpha, bisected Message-ID: <20121008191004.GA10306@redhat.com> References: <20121006204736.GA1830@ds20.borg.net> <20121007165534.GA8024@redhat.com> <20121007171300.GA10942@redhat.com> <20121007180420.GA900@ds20.borg.net> <20121007191627.GA19278@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 619 Lines: 19 On 10/08, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Just wondering. As this is on an SMP system, perhaps the > read_barrier_depends() vs. smp_read_barrier_depends() matters > here? > http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1209.3/00555.html Yes, thanks, I do remember about this ;) This will come as 2/2 which also removes the unnecessary "work = NULL" initialization. Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/