Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752672Ab2JHTZI (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Oct 2012 15:25:08 -0400 Received: from mail-bk0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:54886 "EHLO mail-bk0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751072Ab2JHTZF convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Oct 2012 15:25:05 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <5064790E.4000207@cs.tu-berlin.de> <1348820728-13796-1-git-send-email-schnhrr@cs.tu-berlin.de> <5065B909.1060907@cs.tu-berlin.de> From: Kay Sievers Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 21:24:43 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: drop ambiguous LOG_CONT flag To: =?UTF-8?Q?Jan_H=2E_Sch=C3=B6nherr?= Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 741 Lines: 20 On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Kay Sievers wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 4:49 PM, "Jan H. Schönherr" >> Given that I'm able to fix the racing case, would you be in favor of >> this approach, or should we stick to the earlier version? > > I'm open to everything that makes sense. Let's see how it looks and we > can decide when we have something that passes the tests. Jan, any updates, did you try something else? Or should we merge the first version for now? Thanks, Kay -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/