Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 16:53:44 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
        Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] make CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL invisible and default
Message-ID: <20121008235344.GC8157@kroah.com>
References: <20121002195042.GA16087@www.outflux.net>
 <20121003132538.GE13192@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <20121003161702.GA22008@kroah.com>
 <CAGXu5jL6N2qSokXFr17Re9DOneWx-+seSx7k_dk-A+0mgbOejQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAGXu5jL6N2qSokXFr17Re9DOneWx-+seSx7k_dk-A+0mgbOejQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 2322
Lines: 52

On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 03:08:40PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 06:25:38AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >> On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 12:50:42PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> >> > This config item has not carried much meaning for a while now and is
> >> > almost always enabled by default. As agreed during the Linux kernel
> >> > summit, it should be removed. As a first step, remove it from being
> >> > listed, and default it to on. Once it has been removed from all
> >> > subsystem Kconfigs, it will be dropped entirely.
> >> >
> >> > CC: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> >> > CC: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
> >> > CC: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
> >> > CC: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >> > CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> >> > CC: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> >> > ---
> >> >
> >> > This is the first of a series of 202 patches removing EXPERIMENTAL from
> >> > all the Kconfigs in the tree. Should I send them all to lkml (with all
> >> > the associated CCs), or do people want to cherry-pick changes from my
> >> > tree? I don't want to needlessly flood the list.
> >> >
> >> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kees/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/experimental
> >> >
> >> > I figure this patch can stand alone to at least make EXPERIMENTAL go
> >> > away from the menus, and give us a taste of what the removal would do
> >> > to builds.
> >>
> >> OK, I will bite...  How should I flag an option that is initially only
> >> intended for those willing to take some level of risk?
> >
> > In the text say "You really don't want to enable this option, use at
> > your own risk!"  Or something like that :)
> 
> So, should I update the commit description to include a suggested
> alternative? (If so, which one?)

Which do you prefer?

> Who is going to carry this initial patch, btw?

You?  :)

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/