Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756718Ab2JITdk (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Oct 2012 15:33:40 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:1239 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753781Ab2JITdh (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Oct 2012 15:33:37 -0400 Message-ID: <1349811210.2759.300.camel@ul30vt.home> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] amd_iommu: Refactor IOMMU group and support virtual aliases From: Alex Williamson To: Florian Dazinger Cc: Joerg.Roedel@amd.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 13:33:30 -0600 In-Reply-To: <20121009205758.45c9fcc0@brain.lan> References: <20121009044057.16302.44577.stgit@bling.home> <20121009202738.7e047e64@brain.lan> <1349807739.2759.292.camel@ul30vt.home> <20121009205758.45c9fcc0@brain.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 4527 Lines: 86 On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 20:57 +0200, Florian Dazinger wrote: > Am Tue, 09 Oct 2012 12:35:39 -0600 > schrieb Alex Williamson : > > > On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 20:27 +0200, Florian Dazinger wrote: > > > Am Mon, 08 Oct 2012 22:49:28 -0600 > > > schrieb Alex Williamson : > > > > > > > This series is meant to refactor IOMMU group support in amd_iommu > > > > to properly support virtual aliases. If multiple devices alias to > > > > the same virtual alias, they should be grouped together. This code > > > > also verifies whether the alias should be the root of the group vs > > > > devices above the alias. > > > > > > > > This seems to do the right thing on my system, but that's not saying > > > > a lot since it doesn't do anything interesting with aliases. I'd > > > > appreciate if Joerg and Florian could test this on their systems. > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Alex > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > Alex Williamson (5): > > > > amd_iommu: Properly account for virtual aliases in IOMMU groups > > > > amd_iommu: Split IOMMU group allocation and attach > > > > amd_iommu: Split upstream bus device lookup > > > > amd_iommu: Split IOMMU Group topology walk > > > > amd_iommu: Split IOMMU group initialization > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c | 184 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- > > > > drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_types.h | 1 > > > > 2 files changed, 142 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > patch #5 does not apply cleanly on top of 3.6, I had to edit > > > amd_iommu_types.h manually (easy enough), apart from that, it is > > > working fine! > > > > Thanks Florian. Would you mind also reporting > > 'find /sys/kernel/iommu_groups' for both stock 3.6 and with this series > > applied? I think we want to find that devices 07:00.0 and 08:04.0 are > > grouped together and I'd like to verify whether that actually works. > > Thanks, > > > > Alex > > shure... there does not seem to be much difference? > > with stock 3.6: > /sys/kernel/iommu_groups/19 > /sys/kernel/iommu_groups/19/devices > /sys/kernel/iommu_groups/19/devices/0000:07:00.0 > /sys/kernel/iommu_groups/20 > /sys/kernel/iommu_groups/20/devices > /sys/kernel/iommu_groups/20/devices/0000:08:04.0 > > > 3.6 + your patch-series: > 3.6 with your patch-series: > /sys/kernel/iommu_groups/19 > /sys/kernel/iommu_groups/19/devices > /sys/kernel/iommu_groups/19/devices/0000:07:00.0 > /sys/kernel/iommu_groups/20 > /sys/kernel/iommu_groups/20/devices > /sys/kernel/iommu_groups/20/devices/0000:08:04.0 Ok, I was thinking we'd see these last two devices together, but on second thought this is exactly what the alias is telling us, ie. it can distinguish a DMA from a device on bus 08 from a DMA from 07:00.0 itself, but it cannot distinguish between devices on bus 08 (hopefully that's actually true). If you somehow had a device 08:05.0 you would see a new group 21 with just that device on stock 3.6 whereas with the patches you should see 08:05.0 added to group 20. If we plugged this same card into an Intel VT-d system, the grouping would be done as I was thinking with both 07:00.0 and 08:04.0 being in group 19. Thanks again for your testing, Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/