Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756628Ab2JIUgN (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Oct 2012 16:36:13 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:48620 "EHLO mail-pb0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752927Ab2JIUgL (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Oct 2012 16:36:11 -0400 Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 13:36:08 -0700 (PDT) From: David Rientjes X-X-Sender: rientjes@chino.kir.corp.google.com To: Peter Zijlstra cc: Tang Chen , mingo@redhat.com, miaox@cn.fujitsu.com, wency@cn.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-numa@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Do not use cpu_to_node() to find an offlined cpu's node. In-Reply-To: <1349780256.7880.12.camel@twins> Message-ID: References: <1349665183-11718-1-git-send-email-tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> <1349780256.7880.12.camel@twins> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1561 Lines: 34 On Tue, 9 Oct 2012, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 10:59 +0800, Tang Chen wrote: > > If a cpu is offline, its nid will be set to -1, and cpu_to_node(cpu) will > > return -1. As a result, cpumask_of_node(nid) will return NULL. In this case, > > find_next_bit() in for_each_cpu will get a NULL pointer and cause panic. > > Hurm,. this is new, right? Who is changing all these semantics without > auditing the tree and informing all affected people? > I've nacked the patch that did it because I think it should be done from the generic cpu hotplug code only at the CPU_DEAD level with a per-arch callback to fixup whatever cpu-to-node mappings they maintain since processes can reenter the scheduler at CPU_DYING. The whole issue seems to be because alloc_{fair,rt}_sched_group() does an iteration over all possible cpus (not all online cpus) and does kzalloc_node() which references a now-offlined node. Changing it to -1 makes the slab code fallback to any online node. What I think we need to do instead of hacking only the acpi code and not standardizing this across the kernel is: - reset cpu-to-node with a per-arch callback in generic cpu hotplug code at CPU_DEAD, and - do an iteration over all possible cpus for node hot-remove ensuring there are no stale references. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/