Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754679Ab2JJHyx (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Oct 2012 03:54:53 -0400 Received: from smtp.eu.citrix.com ([62.200.22.115]:35201 "EHLO SMTP.EU.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754359Ab2JJHyv (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Oct 2012 03:54:51 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,564,1344211200"; d="scan'208";a="15061345" Message-ID: <1349855687.6952.75.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 5/9] ARM: Xen: fix initial build problems: From: Ian Campbell To: Arnd Bergmann CC: Stefano Stabellini , "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Russell King , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 08:54:47 +0100 In-Reply-To: <201210091821.27818.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1349796183-30648-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <1349796183-30648-6-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <201210091821.27818.arnd@arndb.de> Organization: Citrix Systems, Inc. Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.3-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1372 Lines: 35 On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 19:21 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 09 October 2012, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > config XEN > > > bool "Xen guest support on ARM (EXPERIMENTAL)" > > > depends on EXPERIMENTAL && ARM && OF > > > + depends on !CPU_V6 > > > help > > > Say Y if you want to run Linux in a Virtual Machine on Xen on ARM. > > > > Considering that we rely on the virtualization extensions, this one can > > be: > > > > depends on CPU_V7 > > > > The rest looks fine. I can submit a second patch to change !CPU_V6 into > > CPU_V7 later, if you prefer. > > CPU_V6 and CPU_V7 are not exclusive, I saw the problem when building a > combined kernel for both V6 and V7. The code also needs to depend on ARMv7 > with virtualization extensions, but that is a different issue. We don't > actually have a configuration symbol for that yet, as far as I can tell. I don't think the guest kernels (including dom0) need the extensions to run under Xen, they are only need by Xen itself. The guests should just see a relatively normal v7 processor. Stefano, does that sound right? Ian. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/