Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932323Ab2JJSNj (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Oct 2012 14:13:39 -0400 Received: from smtp.getmail.no ([84.208.15.66]:53627 "EHLO smtp.getmail.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932220Ab2JJSNf (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Oct 2012 14:13:35 -0400 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 20:13:25 +0200 Subject: Scheduler queues for less os-jitter? To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Uwaysi Bin Kareem Message-id: User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.02 (Linux) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 733 Lines: 18 I was just wondering, have you considered this? If daemons are contributing to os-jitter, wouldn`t having them all on their own queue reduce jitter? So people could have the stuff like in Ubuntu they want, without affecting jitter, or needing stuff like Tiny Core, for tiny jitter? So you get (simplified) something like mainapp - process1 in queue 2, mainapp - process2 in queue 2, mainapp - process 3 in queue 2, etc. Or is that already batch maybe, lol. Peace Be With You. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/