Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756925Ab2JJSSx (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Oct 2012 14:18:53 -0400 Received: from e23smtp02.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.144]:40924 "EHLO e23smtp02.au.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755776Ab2JJSSt (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Oct 2012 14:18:49 -0400 Message-ID: <5075BB04.40003@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 23:44:28 +0530 From: Raghavendra K T Organization: IBM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120911 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Ahern CC: habanero@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Avi Kivity , Peter Zijlstra , Rik van Riel , "H. Peter Anvin" , Ingo Molnar , Marcelo Tosatti , Srikar , "Nikunj A. Dadhania" , KVM , Jiannan Ouyang , chegu vinod , LKML , Srivatsa Vaddagiri , Gleb Natapov , Andrew Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] kvm: Handle undercommitted guest case in PLE handler References: <20120921120000.27611.71321.sendpatchset@codeblue> <505C654B.2050106@redhat.com> <505CA2EB.7050403@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <50607F1F.2040704@redhat.com> <20121003122209.GA9076@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <506C7057.6000102@redhat.com> <506D69AB.7020400@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <506D83EE.2020303@redhat.com> <1349356038.14388.3.camel@twins> <506DA48C.8050200@redhat.com> <20121009185108.GA2549@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1349837987.5551.182.camel@oc6622382223.ibm.com> <5075B63C.5030603@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <5075B88B.1000703@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5075B88B.1000703@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit x-cbid: 12101018-5490-0000-0000-00000242A250 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 739 Lines: 22 On 10/10/2012 11:33 PM, David Ahern wrote: > On 10/10/12 11:54 AM, Raghavendra K T wrote: >> No, I did something like this >> perf kvm --guestvmlinux ./vmlinux.guest top -g -U -d 3. Yes that is a >> good idea. >> >> (I am getting some segfaults with perf top, I think it is already fixed >> but yet to see the patch that fixes) > > What version of perf: perf --version > perf version 2.6.32-279.el6.x86_64.debug (I searched that it is fixed in 288. could not dig-out actual patch though) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/