Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 1 Sep 2002 05:10:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 1 Sep 2002 05:10:14 -0400 Received: from users.linvision.com ([62.58.92.114]:1433 "EHLO abraracourcix.bitwizard.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 1 Sep 2002 05:10:14 -0400 Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 11:14:33 +0200 From: Rogier Wolff To: Alessandro Suardi Cc: Adrian Bunk , R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: drivers/atm/firestream.c doesn't compile in 2.5.33 Message-ID: <20020901111433.A23165@bitwizard.nl> References: <3D716D23.1000101@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D716D23.1000101@oracle.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i Organization: BitWizard.nl Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1006 Lines: 31 On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 03:28:03AM +0200, Alessandro Suardi wrote: > Same symptom as the cpia.c (and IrDA, too). Just change > > #define func_enter() fs_dprintk (FS_DEBUG_FLOW, "fs: enter " > __FUNCTION__ "\n") > > to > > #define func_enter() fs_dprintk (FS_DEBUG_FLOW, "fs: enter %s\n", > __FUNCTION__) Ehmm. I wrote that code, and I made a decision to do it that way. Did I use "invalid C" or did the C spec change? Or did the __FUNCTION__ extension from gcc change? Someone please explain..... Roger. -- ** R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2600998 ** *-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --* * There are old pilots, and there are bold pilots. * There are also old, bald pilots. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/