Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 1 Sep 2002 06:59:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 1 Sep 2002 06:59:49 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:54465 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 1 Sep 2002 06:59:45 -0400 Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2002 03:57:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20020901.035749.37156689.davem@redhat.com> To: szepe@pinerecords.com Cc: marcelo@conectiva.com.br, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] warnkill trivia 2/2 From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20020901105643.GH32122@louise.pinerecords.com> References: <20020901105643.GH32122@louise.pinerecords.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 732 Lines: 18 From: Tomas Szepe Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 12:56:43 +0200 2.4.20-pre5: prevent sparc32's atomic_read() from possibly discarding const qualifiers from pointers passed as its argument. -static __inline__ int atomic_read(atomic_t *v) +static __inline__ int atomic_read(const atomic_t *v) So the atomic_t is const is it? That's news to me. I think you mean something like "atomic_t const * v" which means the pointer is constant, not the value. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/