Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 1 Sep 2002 08:18:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 1 Sep 2002 08:18:07 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:30914 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 1 Sep 2002 08:18:07 -0400 Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2002 05:16:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20020901.051611.85397564.davem@redhat.com> To: szepe@pinerecords.com Cc: marcelo@conectiva.com.br, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] warnkill trivia 2/2 From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20020901121053.GA7325@louise.pinerecords.com> References: <20020901113741.GM32122@louise.pinerecords.com> <20020901.043512.51698754.davem@redhat.com> <20020901121053.GA7325@louise.pinerecords.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 734 Lines: 17 From: Tomas Szepe Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 14:10:53 +0200 > Let's keep the sparc atomic_read() how it is so more bugs > like this can be found. I don't know, though... scratching my head here -- Is GCC actually able to distinguish between 'const int *a' and 'int const *a'? No I don't mean this in a "C" sense, I mean conceptually that marking an object const which has members which are volatile and updated asynchronously makes zero sense. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/