Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933468Ab2JKCqj (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Oct 2012 22:46:39 -0400 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:51807 "HELO mailout-de.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S933061Ab2JKCqi (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Oct 2012 22:46:38 -0400 X-Authenticated: #14349625 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/vkJJSWw/vRKKCMTGesxhLoeGf4JXkq9ikZI4QJw pQKa+xJuYJUUM6 Message-ID: <1349923594.6989.19.camel@marge.simpson.net> Subject: Re: Scheduler queues for less os-jitter? From: Mike Galbraith To: Uwaysi Bin Kareem Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 04:46:34 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1025 Lines: 25 On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 20:13 +0200, Uwaysi Bin Kareem wrote: > I was just wondering, have you considered this? > > If daemons are contributing to os-jitter, wouldn`t having them all on > their own queue reduce jitter? So people could have the stuff like in > Ubuntu they want, without affecting jitter, or needing stuff like Tiny > Core, for tiny jitter? > > So you get (simplified) something like mainapp - process1 in queue 2, > mainapp - process2 in queue 2, mainapp - process 3 in queue 2, etc. > > Or is that already batch maybe, lol. You could try SCHED_AUTOGROUP, or create whatever task groups manually, or use systemd to do that for you. Like everything else having anything to do with scheduling, all are double edged swords, so may help, may hurt. -Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/