Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754090Ab2JKFTv (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Oct 2012 01:19:51 -0400 Received: from fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.35]:60776 "EHLO fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753620Ab2JKFTu (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Oct 2012 01:19:50 -0400 X-SecurityPolicyCheck: OK by SHieldMailChecker v1.7.4 Message-ID: <507656D1.5020703@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 14:19:13 +0900 From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: , CC: , , , , , , Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] Suppress "Device does not have a release() function" warning Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1087 Lines: 29 This patch-set is patches to which [1] and [2] are updated [1] memory-hotplug: add memory_block_release [2] memory-hotplug: add node_device_release from following patch-set. https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/27/39 So the patch-set version is v2. v1 -> v2 [PATCH 1/2] - change subject to Suppress "Device memoryX does not have a release() function" warning. - Add detail information into description - change function name from release_memory_block() to memory_block_release(), because other device release() function is named to _release() [PATCH 2/2] - change subject to Suppress "Device nodeX does not have a release() function" warning. - Add detail information into description - Remove memset() to initialize a node struct from node_device_release() - Add memset() to initialize a node struct into register_node() -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/