Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 1 Sep 2002 17:53:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 1 Sep 2002 17:53:58 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:27919 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 1 Sep 2002 17:53:53 -0400 Message-ID: <3D729020.4DFDAC2B@zip.com.au> Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2002 15:09:36 -0700 From: Andrew Morton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.5.33 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Phillips CC: Christian Ehrhardt , Linus Torvalds , Marcelo Tosatti , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Include LRU in page count References: <3D644C70.6D100EA5@zip.com.au> <3D712682.66E2D3B2@zip.com.au> <20020901212943Z16578-4014+1360@humbolt.nl.linux.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 850 Lines: 21 Daniel Phillips wrote: > > ... > I'm looking at your spinlock_irq now and thinking the _irq part could > possibly be avoided. Can you please remind me of the motivation for this - > was it originally intended to address the same race we've been working on > here? > scalability, mainly. If the CPU holding the lock takes an interrupt, all the other CPUs get to spin until the handler completes. I measured a 30% reducton in contention from this. Not a generally justifiable trick, but this is a heavily-used lock. All the new games in refill_inactive() are there to minimise the interrupt-off time. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/