Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 1 Sep 2002 17:49:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 1 Sep 2002 17:49:48 -0400 Received: from p50887EBD.dip.t-dialin.net ([80.136.126.189]:31970 "EHLO hawkeye.luckynet.adm") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 1 Sep 2002 17:49:28 -0400 Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 15:53:53 -0600 (MDT) From: Thunder from the hill X-X-Sender: thunder@hawkeye.luckynet.adm To: Ralf Baechle cc: Oliver Neukum , Subject: Re: question on spinlocks In-Reply-To: <20020901210504.A22882@bacchus.dhis.org> Message-ID: X-Location: Dorndorf/Steudnitz; Germany MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 959 Lines: 32 Hi, On Sun, 1 Sep 2002, Ralf Baechle wrote: > On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 07:27:53PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > is the following sequence legal ? > > > > spin_lock_irqsave(...); > > ... > > spin_unlock(...); > > schedule(); > > spin_lock(...); > > ... > > spin_unlock_irqrestore(...); > > No; spin_lock_irqsave/spin_unlock_irqrestore and spin_lock/spin_unlock > have to be used in matching pairs. If it was his least problem! He'll run straight into a "schedule w/IRQs disabled" bug. Thunder -- --./../...-/. -.--/---/..-/.-./..././.-../..-. .---/..-/.../- .- --/../-./..-/-/./--..-- ../.----./.-../.-.. --./../...-/. -.--/---/..- .- -/---/--/---/.-./.-./---/.--/.-.-.- --./.-/-.../.-./.././.-../.-.-.- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/