Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 13:49:01 +0900
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@canonical.com>, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>,
        Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] efivarfs: Implement exclusive access for
 {get,set}_variable
Message-ID: <20121012044901.GA17913@kroah.com>
References: <1349961551.174484.910885224391.1.gpush@pecola>
 <1349962956.15966.521.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1349962956.15966.521.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1002
Lines: 27

On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 02:42:36PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 21:19 +0800, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
> > Currently, efivarfs does not enforce exclusion over the get_variable and
> > set_variable operations. Section 7.1 of UEFI requires us to only allow a
> > single processor to enter {get,set}_variable services at once.
> > 
> > This change acquires the efivars->lock over calls to these operations
> > from the efivarfs paths.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@canonical.com>
> > 
> > ---
> >  drivers/firmware/efivars.c |   68 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> >  1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> 
> Thanks, applied to 'next'.

Should this be backported to the stable kernels?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/