Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 1 Sep 2002 21:04:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 1 Sep 2002 21:04:46 -0400 Received: from 2-210.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br ([200.193.160.210]:9105 "EHLO 2-210.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 1 Sep 2002 21:04:46 -0400 Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 22:08:48 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: Daniel Phillips cc: Andrew Morton , Christian Ehrhardt , Linus Torvalds , Marcelo Tosatti , Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Include LRU in page count In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 740 Lines: 21 On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote: > Are we looking at the same thing? The cpu load there is dominated by > cpu_idle, 89%. Anyway, if your point is that it makes sense to run > shrink_cache or refill_inactive in parallel, I don't see it because > they'll serialize on the lru lock anyway. What would make sense is to > make shink_cache nonblocking. Working on it ;) Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/