Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 00:18:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 00:18:43 -0400 Received: from air-2.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:45831 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 00:18:42 -0400 Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 21:21:54 -0700 (PDT) From: "Randy.Dunlap" X-X-Sender: To: Con Kolivas cc: =?ISO-8859-1?B?RGlldGVyIE78dHplbA==?= , Linux Kernel List Subject: Re: Benchmarks for performance patches (-ck) for 2.4.19 In-Reply-To: <1030938156.3d72de2c231ac@kolivas.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 971 Lines: 29 On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Con Kolivas wrote: | Quoting Dieter N?tzel : snippage... | > Then I try dbench (Yes, I know Rik ;-) to see the GREAT speed of Andrea | > Arcangeli's -AA VM which improve noticeably with the Preemption patch. | > O(1) gave some additional speed, too. | | Yes, dbench is included in the many tests available at the the Open Source | Development Lab (osdl.org) along with many others. That makes it good, right? 8;) Actually we are going thru our workloads and trying to identify what they measure, what they are good for, etc., so if you have feedback in this area, please give it to us, for the workloads that we run on each new kernel (2.5.x or 2.4.x-marcelo). -- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/