Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 02:22:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 02:22:23 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:5065 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 02:22:23 -0400 Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2002 23:20:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20020901.232021.00308364.davem@redhat.com> To: wli@holomorphy.com Cc: rml@tech9.net, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@zip.com.au Subject: Re: [TRIVIAL PATCH] Remove list_t infection. From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20020902060257.GO888@holomorphy.com> References: <20020902003318.7CB682C092@lists.samba.org> <1030945918.939.3143.camel@phantasy> <20020902060257.GO888@holomorphy.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 770 Lines: 17 From: William Lee Irwin III Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 23:02:57 -0700 On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 01:51:54AM -0400, Robert Love wrote: > I am all for your cleanup here, but two nits: > Why not rename list_head while at it? I would vote for just "struct > list" ... the name is long, and I like my lines to fit 80 columns. Seconded. Throw the whole frog in the blender, please, not just half. The problem is, it isn't a "list", it's a "list header" or "list marker", ie. a list_head. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/