Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 15:20:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 15:20:53 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:51986 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 15:20:52 -0400 Message-ID: <3D73BB19.6000302@mandrakesoft.com> Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2002 15:25:13 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik Organization: MandrakeSoft User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1b) Gecko/20020722 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linux Kernel Mailing List CC: Linus Torvalds , rth@twiddle.net Subject: required C optimizations? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 857 Lines: 23 Hi all, I'm trying to get an idea of the minimum compiler requirements necessary to build a Linux kernel, excluding parsing requirements. For example, IIRC, some portions of the code depend on 'static inline' working and decent constant propagation/folding. Are you guys aware of a list of such examples, either in your own head or written down somewhere? If you're wondering what this is about, I'm playing around with "tinycc" (http://www.tinycc.org/) ... it's nowhere near building a kernel, being basically a C parser that emits binary code, but I wanted to get an idea of the obstacles. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/