Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752983Ab2JPJCU (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Oct 2012 05:02:20 -0400 Received: from smtp.getmail.no ([84.208.15.66]:51589 "EHLO smtp.getmail.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750950Ab2JPJCT (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Oct 2012 05:02:19 -0400 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 09:03:15 +0200 Subject: Low-jitter kernel benchmark. From: Uwaysi Bin Kareem Message-id: User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.02 (Win32) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 798 Lines: 21 http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTIwNzM While Phoronix usually miss the point of these configs, these benchmarks still show that low-jitter on the desktop, does not affect desktop performance negatively. Only if you are running Apache, on a server, you`d want a different config. And then not even X, so this is not related to "desktop". So this should weigh heavily with any sane desktop-distro maker, for his config. Ubuntu configgers have no valid argument about throughput anymore, for instance. Peace Be With You. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/