Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 3 Sep 2002 10:14:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 3 Sep 2002 10:14:22 -0400 Received: from relay.muni.cz ([147.251.4.35]:59592 "EHLO anor.ics.muni.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 3 Sep 2002 10:14:21 -0400 Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 16:18:46 +0200 From: Jan Kasprzak To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: RAID5 checksum algorithm selection Message-ID: <20020903161846.J18187@fi.muni.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i X-Muni-Virus-Test: Clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1078 Lines: 31 Hello, world!\n I've tested RAID-5 on my new dual athlon box, and got the following messages during system boot: raid5: measuring checksumming speed 8regs : 2550.400 MB/sec 32regs : 1702.000 MB/sec pIII_sse : 4735.600 MB/sec pII_mmx : 3910.800 MB/sec p5_mmx : 5016.800 MB/sec raid5: using function: pIII_sse (4735.600 MB/sec) Why does the kernel decide to use the pIII_sse function, even though the p5_mmx is faster? The kernel is 2.4.20-pre5-ac1. -Yenya -- | Jan "Yenya" Kasprzak | | GPG: ID 1024/D3498839 Fingerprint 0D99A7FB206605D7 8B35FCDE05B18A5E | | http://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/ Czech Linux Homepage: http://www.linux.cz/ | Pruning my incoming mailbox after being 10 days off-line, sorry for the delayed reply. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/